
I usually read the contents page first, looking for any title that strikes me in the technology front. And this one caught my attention: Web Science: Studying the Internet to Protect Our Future by Nigel Shadbolt and Tim Berners-Lee. I read it once there and read it again at home, the online version here, which lists it as in the September issue, but I could have sworn the hardcopy version appears in the October issue. Anyway that is beside the point.

I doubt what I'm about to say constitutes a spoiler, but if you have not seen the movie, fair warning is hereby served.
There was a lot of cars flying off in all directions, in such quick successions that one could hardly imagine the scale of human carnage. But I enjoyed watching the chase sequence on the moving conveyor belt better, simply because I'm so used to seeing car chase sequences that are featured invariably in action movies.
The movie reminded me of The Enemy of the State starring Will Smith and Gene Hackman in which all manners of surveillance tools (CCT, VideoCams, and anything that can “see electronically” and wired together) were used to serve the personal needs of some megalomaniacs. But here the surveillance arsenal went beyond the visual in the passive mode, i.e., observation. She, only because she had a female voice, can do speech recognition by analyzing the facial muscle and mouth movement, better than the deaf reading lips. When that fails, she can also decipher by analyzing the vibrational energy that bounces off a surface. And tapping into cellphones, pagers and the like such as the electronic display boards, is a piece of cake.
Upon exit from the theater, wify said it reminded her of I, Robot, again starring Will Smith, because both involved the super-intelligence, as in the machine/supercomputer, taking matters into their own hand, like humans do. Both reveal the potential dark side of science, when wielded by the wrong kind of people, or wrong-thinking machines for that matter.
What's the link to web science then? Well, web science, as expounded in the SCIAM article, aims to “discover how Web traits arise and how they can be harnessed or held in check to benefit society. Important advances are beginning to be made; more work can solve major issues such as securing privacy and conveying trust”. All premise on the assumption that the ensuing discoveries are in the hands of great men with good intentions, and above all, high morality. But what if they are not? What if they are manipulated by the greatest machine intelligence created by man in the first place, whose allegiance is dictated by binary codes void of all human emotions, empathy, and compassion, like the scenarios played out in Eagle Eye? In the make-believe celluloid world, the good always triumphs over evil, at least in the final analysis when the curtain falls. But would that ending of good feeling always have its parallel in the real world? Far-fetched? Maybe. But I just can't help thinking about it, much against my training in rational thought.
And yes, the voice of Aria belongs to Julianne Moore, who chose to remain uncredited for her role. Aria who? She is both the female voice playing havoc in Jerry and Rachel's lives and that super-doper of a computer that supposedly would follow human instructions.
And Shia Labeouf is simply phenomenal, a glib talker who easily matches the Gilmore Girls. If Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull has shown Shia Labeouf to be a star in the making, then Eagle Eye confirms his status as one.
So Eagle Eye is the second best movie I have ever seen, after The Dark Knight. But perhaps this impression may have changed if we had watched it in IMAX instead ...
No comments:
Post a Comment